Asrock B85M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '19 at 06:06
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 29.3
2-Core 50.5
36% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 316
24% 216 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 7.16
6% 7.82 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 8
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.65 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 136 62 33 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 420
Write 393
Mixed 338
SusWrite 92.2
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 21.5
71% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 137
132% 203 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 102%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 133 136 136 138 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 85
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 133
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 8
Write 17.3
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 17.1
22% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
114% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-831.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-HDS Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback