Asrock B85M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '19 at 05:41
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 43.4 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 97.4 34% 58.7 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 360 26% 241 Pts	64-Core 546 34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.45% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 6.25 6% 7.44 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.43 7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 42 31 29 32 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 357 Write 337 Mixed 284 SusWrite 52.7 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 21.9 74% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 224 176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 102%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 119 136 136 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 130 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 84%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 59GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 13.2 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 16.7 21% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 88% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-831.A00LF 2x8GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 14.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-HDS Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS - $88

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	62x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	37x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 5,025 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16