Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S06IT
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 30 '15 at 17:41
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 159
56% 122 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 330
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.982.6.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 3.25
3% 3.92 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.96
5% 5.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 494
Write 322
Mixed 388
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 7.45
80% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 14.2
22% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 75%
TrekStor DS pocket Xpress 250GB
55GB free, PID 0022
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
Read 40.2
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.8
50% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.78
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 6.25
724% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 10.4
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 6.1
759% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 58.4
Write 6.14
Mixed 12.7
23% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.53
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.34
59% 3.41 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 16%
Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback