TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Notebook P15SM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemNotebook P15SM  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P15SM
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '15 at 16:21
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 57.4
18% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 245
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 32% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5106) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3272
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 2.12
1% 2.08 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.62%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65% Good
Read 424
Write 325
Mixed 265
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 18.9
82% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 36.3
39% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 65%
 Great: 104%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
220GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45% Average
Read 77.7
Write 78.7
Mixed 72.4
57% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.37
98% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 45%
 Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 17.8
Mixed 22.3
28% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.57
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 1.39
130% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 15.4%
 Great: 35%
OCZ R2_TURBO 8GB
8GB free, PID ac02
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 22
Mixed 23.3
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.85
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.14
32% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 10.9%
 Great: 13%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P15SM Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P15SM

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel  $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples43x
Core i7-4800MQIntel  $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples13x
Core i7-4930MXIntelBench 69%, 1,497 samples5x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples49x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples12x
GTX 780MNvidiaBench 23%, 3,739 samples9x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston  $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung  $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples3x
RAM
BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 54%, 732 samples4x
16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 52%, 172 samples4x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback