Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 04:50
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 319
106% 193 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,074
103% 848 Pts
64-Core 1,611
100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 218
Parallax 221
164% 213 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 212
Splatting 145
163% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 151%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 1328 801 805 806 800 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,304
Write 2,248
Mixed 1727
SusWrite 941
404% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.2
269% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,515
DQ Write 1,287
DQ Mixed 1,372
1,036% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 295%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
780GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2180 2197 1519 1504 1520 1521 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2284
Write 2,231
Mixed 1,804
SusWrite 1,740
453% 2,015 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 82.6
277% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,622
DQ Write 1,420
DQ Mixed 1,501
1,131% 1,514 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
29GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 454 458 458 457 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 461
Mixed 402
SusWrite 423
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 45.7
151% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 332
251% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 156 167 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 164
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 163
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
416GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 69
Write 69.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 69.5
86% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 32.5
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 33.2
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,291
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback