Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 02:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 194
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 542
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 126
Parallax 108
85% 113 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 109
Splatting 93.4
78% 95.8 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 112 109 107 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 352
Write 226
Mixed 183
SusWrite 111
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 19
73% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 118
103% 160 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
286GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 126
Mixed 82
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
295GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 125
Write 48
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 46.5
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C10 1315 BLS8G3D169DS3.16FE 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 1315 BLS8G3D169DS3.16FE 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback