Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171116
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 710 72% 581 Pts	64-Core 962 60% 962 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 64.9 61% 71 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 71.2 58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 498 Write 472 Mixed 405 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 54.9 182% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 136 137 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 79.5 Write 112 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 136 70% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 192% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 243GB free Firmware: MS1OA650 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 117 127 127 128 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 125 Write 114 Mixed 26 SusWrite 125 70% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB 8,931 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $188Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,541x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	842x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	585x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	407x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	353x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	346x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	99x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	149x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	92x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $646

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369