Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '19 at 11:37
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 707 71% 575 Pts	64-Core 911 56% 911 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3730) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.4% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 139 Parallax 119 96% 126 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 119 Splatting 105 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 154 155 155 156 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 477 Mixed 360 SusWrite 189 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 56 191% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 294 221% 295 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 75GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 809 437 273 271 250 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 126 126 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 128 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 125 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GNT F4-2133C15-8GNS 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.5% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,411x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	541x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	535x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	321x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	230x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	209x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $661

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16