Asus CG8270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus CG8270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8270
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120829
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 11:01
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 518
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 841D) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 29.7
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 22.6
22% 28 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 420 444 441 433 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 430
Mixed 330
SusWrite 395
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 32.9
107% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 163
169% 278 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 118%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
650GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 77 75 75 74 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 81
Write 58.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 71.1
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 51%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 179 178 180 180 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 134
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 169
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 104%
WD My Book 1TB
45GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 26.9
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 04CB HY64C1C1624ZY 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback