Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 382
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 19.3
18% 22 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 22.9
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 44 50 49 39 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 459
Write 23.4
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 45.8
29% 139 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 33
129% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 24.5
50% 110 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
468GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 107
Write 75.9
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 106
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback