Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '19 at 23:40
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 98.2 1-Core 159 2-Core 311 104% 189 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 874 91% 733 Pts	64-Core 845 52% 845 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2167) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 116 Parallax 120 99% 119 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 99 Splatting 80 84% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 617 608 609 609 620 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,467 Write 2,272 Mixed 1,599 SusWrite 660 390% 1,750 MB/s	4K Read 65.3 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 87.8 294% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,202 DQ Write 1,066 DQ Mixed 821 701% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 174GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 314 313 313 314 313 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 482 Mixed 378 SusWrite 331 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 61.2 212% 75.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 353 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 124%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 13 159 4.4 36 62 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 301 Write 103 Mixed 273 SusWrite 86 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 23 124% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 138 134% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 78GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 476 476 476 477 414 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 455 Mixed 393 SusWrite 466 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 60.7 206% 73.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 132%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 26GB free Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 128 139 134 138 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 394 Write 151 Mixed 184 SusWrite 131 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 40.8 156% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 160 122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 87%
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419 137 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 66GB free Firmware: 5.0.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 140 141 146 148 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.1% Good	Read 131 Write 212 Mixed 159 SusWrite 142 37% 161 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 38.7 148% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 153 127% 182 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C14 2x8GB 1,180 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 29 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 27.8 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 45.1 89% 45.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	919x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	323x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	183x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	267x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	218x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	202x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	93x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $629

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16