Acer Aspire V3-571G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 429
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0647) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 960GB-$109
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 426 202 129 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 392
Write 402
Mixed 122
SusWrite 224
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 17.4
63% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 11.6
95% 221 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G 6GB
666, 666 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571G Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback