Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 18:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 222
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 809
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 59.1
50% 60.1 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 59.8
55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 101 51 87 100 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 455
Write 149
Mixed 129
SusWrite 83.9
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1.3
37% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 1
23% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 188 187 188 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 168
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 187
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 30.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback