Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 10:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 153
55% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 304
32% 255 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 8386) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 12.5
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 16
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 78 80 79 82 81 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 138
Write 278
Mixed 248
SusWrite 77.6
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 10.5
53% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 37.7
36% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
801GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 90 78 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 87.2
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
881GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 81 81 79 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 48
Write 91
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 78.9
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.5
184% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $532
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback