Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130610
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 14:25
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 91
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 359
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8382) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.48 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2
2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 93 92 85 91 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46% Average
Read 195
Write 121
Mixed 162
SusWrite 93
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 26.8
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 93.8
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 100
79% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
233GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 125
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
232GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 141
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 174 176 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 161
Write 168
Mixed 117
SusWrite 174
211% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback