Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 118
58% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 218
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 87.3
47% 70.4 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 56
50% 62 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 43GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 316 140 301 300 297 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.3% Excellent
Read 391
Write 115
Mixed 308
SusWrite 266
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 40.8
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 181
133% 172 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 92%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
4GB free
Firmware: EXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 383
Mixed 326
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 47.7
158% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 203
151% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88X-D3HP Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback