Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 09:27
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 394 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 95 55% 76.8 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 55.9 51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,120 Write 4,722 Mixed 4,527 1,069% 4790 MB/s	4K Read 348 4K Write 222 4K Mixed 249 964% 273 MB/s	DQ Read 1,269 DQ Write 980 DQ Mixed 1,134 846% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 759GB free Firmware: CS900BA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 282 342 293 370 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 156 Write 97 Mixed 83 SusWrite 323 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 9.9 40% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 13.8 10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 325GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 72 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 118 Write 118 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 70.4 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19.6 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	69x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	46x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,979 samples	6x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 2,501 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $539

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16