Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$99 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 347 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20% Poor	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 82.2 0% 49.9 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 63 Splatting 80.9 59% 70.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Happy Disk Multi-Path Disk Device 129GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 9.5 9.2 14 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 30% Great: 39%
Happy Disk Multi-Path Disk Device 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 18 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	Read 83 Write 20.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 17.4 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.5 496% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 29%
Happy Disk Multi-Path Disk Device 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 19 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Read 2.8 Write 51.8 Mixed 5 SusWrite 17.5 14% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.2 126% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 34%
Happy Disk Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 18 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 17.8 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 19.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	464x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	202x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	138x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16