ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20BHS14S03

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 20BHS14S03 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20BHS14S03
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 187 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 485 51% 409 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M 5,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 221A) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 7.72 6% 6.95 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 8.87 7% 8.46 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00R240GB 240GB 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02000007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 77 75 67 68 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 453 Write 236 Mixed 341 SusWrite 105 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 27.2 106% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 177 164% 250 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 9.7 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback