Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 10:55
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 948
91% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E354) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1335 MHz, MLim: 1980 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 70
Parallax 90.4
58% 77.4 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 58.4
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 172 144 155 135 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 431
Write 206
Mixed 197
SusWrite 156
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 16.6
78% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 44.7
DQ Mixed 68.8
70% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 117%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
919GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 97.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 79.5
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 67%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 159 156 153 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 143
Write 158
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 156
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
313% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 45.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
173GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 71.4
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
36GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 46.3
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
318GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 63.3
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 62.2
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 57%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
4GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 27.6
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
70GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 52.6
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 44.4
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
237GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 81
Write 74.8
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 45.2
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $508Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback