Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '19 at 03:04
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 277
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 922
88% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E354) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1980 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 72
Parallax 94
56% 78.1 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 59.4
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 145 115 118 132 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 426
Write 210
Mixed 202
SusWrite 131
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 19.4
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 50.9
62% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 117%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
928GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 78 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 91
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 79.7
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 67%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 158 159 153 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 155
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 45.9
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
173GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 164
Write 144
Mixed 84
SusWrite 71.3
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
42GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 128
Write 107
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 46.4
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
318GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 62 62 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 61.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 61.9
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 57%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
4GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 30.3
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
71GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 44 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 53.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 44.6
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
243GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 79
Write 72.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 45.2
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback