Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 633
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 82
56% 70.9 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 77.7
54% 65 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 471 471 477 467 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 477
Mixed 418
SusWrite 469
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 47.8
164% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
36GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 309 310 310 308 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 463
Mixed 440
SusWrite 324
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 52.5
179% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
262GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 180 178 178 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 118
Mixed 70
SusWrite 178
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 112%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 133 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 145
Write 124
Mixed 109
SusWrite 131
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 75%
VERBATIM 4GB
1GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.7
6% 5.33 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback