Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '19 at 21:41
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 205 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 399 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 55.7 34% 45.5 fps	MRender 55.2 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 36.3 37% 47 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH060GMCT 60GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTCAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 228 228 230 230 162 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.3% Above average	Read 246 Write 230 Mixed 231 SusWrite 217 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 26.9 84% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 180 134% 176 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 422GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 119 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 120 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 20.6 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	100x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	78x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	116x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	26x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16