Toshiba Satellite L855

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L855  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 431
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.19 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Integral 240GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM07.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 459
Write 285
Mixed 200
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 18.3
79% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 47.9
70% 126 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 81%
Seagate Portable 500GB
340GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.2
Write 25.7
Mixed 17.4
30% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
WD A MQ01A External 750GB
104GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 25.7
Write 25.7
Mixed 17.7
29% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.7
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.4
33% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
981GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 22.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 13.4
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L855 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback