bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 150
56% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 286
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 204GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 111 117 68 68 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
Read 358
Write 299
Mixed 349
SusWrite 95.4
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 21.4
73% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 170
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 66%
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
77GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 145 145 84 79 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 340
Write 281
Mixed 328
SusWrite 119
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 21.2
73% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 169
128% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 115 116 71 66 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 357
Write 286
Mixed 335
SusWrite 96.9
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 20.1
67% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 164
124% 168 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback