bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.8 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 11:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 33
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 95.7
31% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 101
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 108
Write 5.5
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 4.8
24% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
524% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 222
Write 161
Mixed 154
134% 179 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 7
1,112% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 512 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 20.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback