MSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7522
MotherboardMSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 00:32
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 167
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 403
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 36.5
26% 32.2 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 31.9
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 173 208 142 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 233
Write 221
Mixed 204
SusWrite 165
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 34
111% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 49.5
41% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Pro (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback