Lenovo 80VR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80VR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-75I
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 173
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 435
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 38E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1771
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 57.2
51% 62.9 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 63.2
51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$80
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 930 1025 1044 1057 546 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 999
Mixed 1,051
SusWrite 819
272% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 79.4
267% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 620
527% 768 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 252%
Great: 241%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
460GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 91 91 90 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 89.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 88.8
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS824A.C8FADP 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 14.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80VR Builds (Compare 1,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Lenovo 80VR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback