Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180829
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 08:12
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 864
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1135
70% 1135 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 63.2
54% 66.8 fps
MRender 74.7
Gravity 64
Splatting 60.3
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 301 303 303 303 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 466
Mixed 372
SusWrite 302
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 36.4
163% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 237
205% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WRSN 1TB
371GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 150 128 207 33 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 449
Write 308
Mixed 178
SusWrite 119
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 35.9
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 221
185% 270 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
187GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 82.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 63.7
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 859B CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 26.8
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.7
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback