MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7984
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 05:05
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 596
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 186
Parallax 176
142% 179 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 178
Splatting 126
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 428 430 324 379 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 458
Mixed 376
SusWrite 391
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.7
187% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 266
226% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
428GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 436 421 438 437 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 470
Mixed 446
SusWrite 429
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 56.4
196% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 100%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
567GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.2
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 89.3
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
223GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 114 116 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 115
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) Builds (Compare 1,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) - $174

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback