Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 01:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 643
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7.97
5% 8.45 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 15.9
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 308 303 304 295 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 408
Mixed 327
SusWrite 304
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 47
160% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 304
237% 327 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Inateck 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 34
Write 34.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 38.7
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 32%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback