Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 12:38
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 200
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 458
51% 401 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 56.3
42% 57.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 63.2
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 128 126 127 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 451
Write 133
Mixed 124
SusWrite 128
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 17.9
106% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 48.8
80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 188 184 183 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 151
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 185
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback