Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory	1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B800 2,662 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 21.6 26% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 29.3 8-Core 39.3 4% 34.3 Pts	64-Core 40.7 2% 40.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C606) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.65 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 14 17 29 17 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 17.6 Write 45.3 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 20.1 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 0.7 4% 1.33 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	166x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	162x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	71x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	239x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	165x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	52x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	35x
QUM3S-8G1333C9 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 22 samples	22x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253