Lenovo 81BG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 81BG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory17 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 279
44% 316 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 7.75
6% 10 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 15.5
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 322 311 311 311 313 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 426
Mixed 376
SusWrite 317
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 54.2
182% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81BG Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81BG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback