Asrock P55 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P55 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100720
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '19 at 09:14
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 83 2-Core 159 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 398 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3731) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 130 Parallax 133 81% 121 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 125 Splatting 103 108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 511GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 112 109 112 109 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.5% Poor	Read 170 Write 113 Mixed 131 SusWrite 110 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 13.3 45% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 6.4 16% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 58%
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$320 1,236 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 226GB free Firmware: E7FT Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 697 747 688 675 651 630 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 613 Write 715 Mixed 432 SusWrite 681 138% 610 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 27.5 98% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 579 DQ Mixed 397 302% 393 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P55 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Extreme4

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	6x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	5x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $105Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	11x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16