Asrock P55 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P55 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '19 at 11:53
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 157
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 392
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87% Excellent
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 127
Parallax 145
76% 122 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 125
Splatting 107
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 511GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 171
Write 112
Mixed 130
SusWrite 113
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 13.1
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 52.3
34% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 58%
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$320
221GB free
Firmware: E7FT Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 815 788 705 705 628 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 687
Write 746
Mixed 430
SusWrite 754
148% 654 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 31
104% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 388
317% 437 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 126%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback