Asus M51BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus M51BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51BC
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140107
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 23:41
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 115
55% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 251
29% 225 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 50.7
34% 43.8 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 37.1
38% 47.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 207 122 75 253 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 51
Write 88.7
Mixed 229
SusWrite 176
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 24.1
76% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 92.3
78% 117 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
771GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 29 30 39 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 85
Write 84.7
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 36.4
48% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
14GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 45 39 54 38 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 178
Write 90
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 47.5
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
364GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 72 66 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 60.7
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 67.7
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$44
529GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 107
SusWrite 101
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
895GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 98 95 89 101 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 93.6
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 78%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
398GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 91 93 93 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 103
Write 64
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 90.3
101% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 55%
Seagate FreeAgent Pro 750GB
469GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 32 32 32 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 31.2
45% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.83 MB/s
EPSON Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.3
3% 2.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 6%
SABRENT 300GB
278GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 57.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 56.9
70% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback