Packard EasyNote TM86

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TM86  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM86
Memory3.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 640
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 158
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 197
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 036D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 51 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 158
Write 54.8
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 50.6
19% 85 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 14.7
53% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 68.5
DQ Write 56.1
DQ Mixed 60.1
46% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB ACR128X64D3S1333C9 5GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TM86 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM86

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback