Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TM86 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM86
Memory	3.6 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '19 at 18:13
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 56.2 24% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 79.8 8-Core 78.5 11% 79.2 Pts	64-Core 86.6 5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521A SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 49 53 52 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 145 Write 53.2 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 50.6 18% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 11.2 37% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 62.2 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 58.3 44% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB ACR128X64D3S1333C9 5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	2x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	4x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	2x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16