Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 05:15
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 978
87% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,348
83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 137
Parallax 127
100% 129 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 124
Splatting 105
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2271 602 603 602 604 602 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,654
SusWrite 881
416% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 88.5
299% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1039
DQ Mixed 1,140
849% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 298%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
20GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 517
Write 496
Mixed 468
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 66.3
224% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
188GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1163 435 306 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,357
Write 1,163
Mixed 553
SusWrite 471
197% 886 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 56
207% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 752
658% 976 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 195%
Great: 236%
Intel SSDSCKGW256H6 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: BG11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 241 232 254 255 254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 312
Mixed 309
SusWrite 249
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 162
155% 242 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 31.7
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback