PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170-K (all builds) |
Memory | 14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180516 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 30 '19 at 20:51 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 303 291 294 294 265 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
357GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 104 106 108 109 108 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
229GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 156 158 158 159 159 MB/s
|
90%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.2%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,125x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 551x |
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 362x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 343x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 271x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 231x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $895 |