Asus Z170-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-K  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 00:30
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 95.7
34% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 527
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1140 MHz, MLim: 1414 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.4% Poor
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 81.7
4% 41.9 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 74.6
53% 63.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 292 289 283 234 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 470
Write 455
Mixed 366
SusWrite 280
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 38
123% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 360
267% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
360GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 103 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 57
SusWrite 105
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
229GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 154 151 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 159
Mixed 31
SusWrite 156
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-K Builds (Compare 2,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-K - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback