Medion Erazer P6679 MD60261

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer P6679 MD60261 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15KHN
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160914
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '19 at 15:58
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	43%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 135 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 226 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 6.84 6% 9.82 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 13.6 7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD00.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 35 42 53 22 58 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 185 Write 211 Mixed 304 SusWrite 70 44% 192 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 29.3 129% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 60.1 94% 184 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 362GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 83 82 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 120 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 85.8 71% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.5 180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 66%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.2 9 9 8.8 9.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 11.8 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 9.2 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 94% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB 6,821 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer P6679 MD60261 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60261

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	1x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1x

SSD
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GBBench 63%, 324 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 6,821 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16