PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140407 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 29 '19 at 20:40 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.1.1
|
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 39 46 50 46 42 MB/s
|
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
115GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 66 76 77 77 77 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
927GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 104 104 103 103 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
919GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 78 77 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 565x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $609 |