Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 56.6 34% 51 Pts	4-Core 84.6 8-Core 137 14% 111 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX 7,286 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Acer(1025 1094) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8863 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.11% Terrible	Lighting 9.67 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 10.1 8% 9.42 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 7.35 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.11% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 168 192 184 201 191 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 297 Write 203 Mixed 160 SusWrite 179 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 17.8 73% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 166 148% 224 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 18.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,544x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	606x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples	583x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	281x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	111x
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples	89x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples	396x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	137x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples	119x