PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7H55-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101214 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '19 at 13:18 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 16 7.4 6.4 7.7 MB/s
|
6.9%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$53
45GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 23 12 10 12 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1176
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.1 1.7 6.7 5.5 6.6 MB/s
|
4.64%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 32x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 31x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 7x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |