Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 06:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 522
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 176
Parallax 192
130% 176 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 127
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
320GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 351 378 374 357 362 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 432
Mixed 443
SusWrite 364
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 52.8
174% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 134
128% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 300 303 303 316 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 454
Mixed 409
SusWrite 311
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 53.2
177% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 225
178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 351 391 407 364 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 454
Mixed 444
SusWrite 359
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 51.1
169% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 165
148% 226 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback