Lenovo 20CK0007SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20CK0007SC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20CK0007SC
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '16 at 08:24
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 45.1
30% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 64
8-Core 143
12% 103 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2225) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 6.69
4% 7.1 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 10.5
7% 7.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 481
Write 400
Mixed 385
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 22.1
58% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 46.5
49% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 13.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback