Biostar N68S3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar N68S3+  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 14:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 88.7
45% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 178
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.75
5% 7.03 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.26 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 181 181 191 183 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 231
Write 91.6
Mixed 207
SusWrite 183
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 21.8
71% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 53.6
44% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68S3+ Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback