MSI PH67S-C43 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI PH67S-C43 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '16 at 13:15
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 32
Parallax 43.4
26% 35.6 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 26.9
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 405
Mixed 412
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 39.5
132% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 115
128% 218 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 124%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
605GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 121
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.25
94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 1333 CL9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PH67S-C43 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI PH67S-C43 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback